Skip to main content

Nutrition-related health effects of organic foods


Am J Clin Nutr (May 12, 2010). doi:10.3945/ajcn.2010.29269
ABSTRACT
Nutrition-related health effects of organic foods: a systematic
review1,2,3,4
Alan D Dangour, Karen Lock, Arabella Hayter, Andrea Aikenhead, Elizabeth Allen and Ricardo
Uauy
1 From the NutritionPublic Health Intervention Research Unit Department of EpidemiologyPopulation Health
(ADD AH AARU) the Health Services Research Unit Department of Public HealthPolicy (KL)the Medical Statistics Unit
Department of EpidemiologyPopulation Health (EA) London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine London United Kingdom.
2 The UK Food Standards Agency had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, or writing of the
report.
3 Supported by the UK Food Standards Agency (PAU221).
4 Address correspondence to AD Dangour, Nutrition and Public Health Intervention Research Unit, Department of
Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom.
E-mail: alan.dangour@lshtm.ac.uk.

Background: There is uncertainty over the nutrition-related benefits to health of consuming organic foods.
Objective: We sought to assess the strength of evidence that nutrition-related health benefits could be attributed to the consumption of foods produced under organic farming methods.
Design: We systematically searched PubMed, ISI Web of Science, CAB Abstracts, and Embase between 1 January 1958 and 15 September 2008 (and updated until 10 March 2010); contacted subject experts; and hand-searched bibliographies. We included peer-reviewed articles with English abstracts if they reported a comparison of health outcomes that resulted from consumption of or exposure to organic compared with conventionally produced foodstuffs.
Results: From a total of 98,727 articles, we identified 12 relevant studies. A variety of different study designs were used; there were 8 reports (67%) of human studies, including 6 clinical trials, 1 cohort study, and 1 cross-sectional study, and 4 reports (33%) of studies in animals or human cell lines or serum. The results of the largest study suggested an association of reported consumption of strictly organic dairy products with a reduced risk of eczema in infants, but the majority of the remaining studies showed no evidence of differences in nutrition-related health outcomes that result from exposure to organic or conventionally produced foodstuffs. Given the paucity of available data, the heterogeneity of study designs used, exposures tested, and health outcomes investigated, no quantitative meta-analysis was justified.
Conclusion: From a systematic review of the currently available published literature, evidence is lacking for nutrition-related health effects that result from the consumption of organically produced foodstuffs.
Received for publication January 25, 2010. Accepted for publication April 20, 2010

Popular posts from this blog

BRASIL Análise: Como um filme pró-golpe (falso!) de 1964 viralizou nas redes sociais Pesquisador descreve os 3 passos da estratégia usada por influenciadores e sites sem credibilidade (veja a credibilidade dele logo abaixo da primeira foto no *) para fomentar a polarização virtual Por  Por Rafael Goldzweig*, especial para EXAME access_time 9 abr 2019, 16h36 - Publicado em 9 abr 2019, 16h03 Exército durante a Ditadura Militar de 1964 (Bettmann / Contributor/Getty Images) *Autor na Iniciação Cientifica da tese "O ingresso da Venezuela no Mercosul: análise dos aspectos políticos e econômicos", onde descreve "... A importância do tema justifica-se pela importância que o bloco adquiriria com a adesão desse novo país, tendo em vista a ampliação dos mercados consumidores e das reservas petrolíferas do bloco." Artigo de Rafael Goldzweig, coordenador de análise de redes sociais na Democracy Reporting International Na última semana, o f...

The great organic myths

Why organic foods are an indulgence the world can't afford They're not healthier or better for the environment – and they're packed with pesticides. In an age of climate change and shortages, these foods are an indugence the world can't afford, argues environmental expert Rob Johnston Thursday, 1 May 2008   Myth one: Organic farming is good for the environment The study of Life Cycle Assessments (LCAs) for the UK, sponsored by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, should concern anyone who buys organic. It shows that milk and dairy production is a major source of greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs). A litre of organic milk requires 80 per cent more land than conventional milk to produce, has 20 per cent greater global warming potential, releases 60 per cent more nutrients to water sources, and contributes 70 per cent more to acid rain. Also, organically reared cows burp twice as much methane as conventionally reared cattle...